- levelupms
- May 13, 2024
- 3 min read
Most of the graduates from universities and colleges lack practical and employable skills. Thus, there is a big mismatch between the labor market needs and what universities and colleges [URT, 2021] produce. Incubation, internship, and training industry-government linkages (TIGLs) could address the mismatch. However, these options have not only remained weak but also exclude agriculture [Kaijage, 2007]. As a result, most of the youth in agribusiness lack practical skills. The absence of new farming technologies’ application skills, entrepreneurship, and financial management skills among youth, particularly those in rural areas, have remained critical challenges limiting their performance and accessibility to resources such as loans (Youth Forum; URT/MoA, 2020). Access to extension services to youth is also limited, a situation that discourages youth engagement in agriculture (URT/MoA, 2020). Youth in rural areas have smartphones but they lack skills to use them to access information related to market, access to agro-inputs and logistics [Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, 2020]. Most of the youth lack awareness about health-related issues which are important in their daily life [Lindsjö et al., 2020].
Limited access to and ownership of land: Land is a major input in agricultural production. Limited access to land among youth in agriculture has been extensively reported (URT/ MoA, 2020) and increasingly becoming more challenging because of population growth and delayed transfer of land ownership to youth due to increased life expectancy [Lindsjö, et al., 2020]. The majority of youth either farm in family or land leased on seasonal/short-term basis [URT, 2016, Lindsjö, et al., 2020; Snyder et al., 2019]. Both options of access to land are associated with limited investment and restrictions on the application of fertilizer and pesticide hence low outputs [Lindsjö, et al., 2020]. As youth cannot invest (install irrigation systems) in the land they do not own, they have been farming based on rainy seasons (URT/MoA, 2020), which has been affected by climate change. Farming family land implies that youth have limited control of output, hence lack of resources to purchase their own land and become independent [Snyder et al., 2019].
Limited access to agro-inputs and extension services: Compared to the middle age group, youth apply less mechanized farming techniques, i.e., application of low-quality seeds, non-use of fertilizers and pesticides even when the improved seeds and other agro-inputs are available in their localities. This is because they lack cash to procure them and their access to sources of finance (direct credits) [Lindsjö et al., 2020] and value chain financing are limited. Consequently, youth perceive the utilization of improved agricultural inputs and application of recommendations from extension officers as expensive and unaffordable [Lindsjö et al., 2020]. In some of the rural areas, the supply of tools and machineries is limited, which is also a major obstacle for mechanization of farming among youth [Lindsjö et al., 2020]. iv. Limited access to market, related infrastructure, and auxiliary services: Limited accesses to market, appropriate logistics facilities, packaging materials and limited market information have been the major challenges for youth [Suleiman, 2018]. These challenges result in unreliable and low price of crops and high post-harvest losses, especially for perishable crops like horticulture in which majority of youth are involved in (URT/ MoA, 2020; Ng’atigwa et al., 2020). Transport costs are also considered very high (URT/ MoA, 2020). The development of out-grower schemes or contract farming, which could provide a ready market and facilitate value chain financing and access to improved agro-inputs, is challenged by the lack of contract farming law/ regulation to govern contract farming implementation and protection of parties involved. Consequently, enforcement of contract farming has remained weak and the interests of parties in the contract are not protected. Some contract buyers, who sometimes offer inputs to youth on credit, fail to collect their money through buying crops from the youth as youth get involved inside selling.